Guide to Gun Law and Gun Control For American Journalists

There are plenty of articles and video on the internet about what SHOULD be done but it seems that a lot of journalists, gun owners, and people from other walks of life could benefit from understanding what the current laws are and how they apply to the use, sale, and industry of firearms.

Hoping to clarify some of the finer points, while also creating a SIMPLE and Easy to Understand guide for writers, reporters, and journalists of all kinds; what follows is a brief and ACCURATE guide to American Gun Laws that are relevant when reporting on anything to do with gun laws and the gun control efforts in America.

What follows is fact only … with no editorial or opinion about either side of the gun control debate. Here I stick to the facts so that anyone on either side of the debate can at least understand the TRUTH of our current legal climate.

Lets Start With Background Checks – Gun Show & Online Loopholes

gun control

Federal law requires that anyone who is “in the business” of selling guns obtain a Federal Firearm License which is a license granted and regulated by the ATF. These FFLs (or gun dealers) are required to conduct a background check on any buyer to whom they sell a gun. This background check is conducted via the National Instant Criminal Background Check (NICS) system established in 1998. Anyone with a felony conviction or various other disqualifying history is denied the right to own or purchase a gun.

Private transactions of guns between two private parties who are not “dealers” are not regulated at the federal level and do not require background checks. Some states (12 as of this writing) have laws generally referred to as “Universal Background Check” laws that require that all transfers of guns, regardless of who the sellers are, must include a background check performed by a dealer.

Thus, at a gun show those who are in the business of selling guns still have to conduct a background check on their buyers and those who are not in the business of selling guns can sell one without a background on their buyer unless they live in a state with a “Universal Background Check” law in place.

Online purchases of guns by dealers still require a background check. If the buyer is not local to the online dealer then the dealer must ship the firearm to a dealer local to the buyer so a background check can still be performed. Private sellers advertising guns for sale via a form of online classifieds could still sell a firearm to a local buyer the same way as any other private transaction assuming they live in a state that doesn't have a “Universal Background Check Law.”

Additional Information on Background Checks

Next Some Clarification On Gun Registration

gun law

The Firearm Owner Protection Act (FOPA) of 1986 formally established the illegality of any organization or government entity keeping a database of gun owners and/or their guns. So conceptually the idea of gun registration is illegal, however there are a handful of local jurisdictions that do it anyway either believing that their laws/practices are older than FOPA, or just in complete defiance of Federal law.

New York City is the easiest example of a local jurisdiction which keeps detailed records of firearm serial numbers and the owners of those firearms. Despite NYC's practice, across the vast majority of the US with only a few exceptions (DC & Hawaii are two more) there are no databases of gun owners. Background checks for firearm sales in the NICS system (explained above) don't include the details of the firearms being purchased and these records are required by law to be destroyed by the federal government soon after the background check is completed.

This is important to understand because it helps us understand the concept of Ghost Guns. A Ghost Gun is by definition a firearm that does not have a serial number. Ghost Guns could be made in part or completly by any American Citizen legally so long as the firearm is for personal use and not commercial purposes. While Ghost Guns are not registered or traceable, that doesn't make them any different than any firearm that does have a serial number and is sold from a traditional gun store since serialized guns are also NOT registered and NOT traceable unless you live in one of those small number of municipalities where gun registration exists.

There is an exception for weapons regulated by the NFA … which is our next subject.

Additional Information on Firearm Registration

What Are NFA / Class 3 / Title 2 Weapons?

firearm suppressor

The National Firearms Act of 1934 regulates certain items and types of weapons. This law was clarified and adjusted in subsequent legislation as well. Currently silencers/suppressors, short barrel rifles & shotguns, and fully automatic firearms can only be owned by a private citizen if that individual pays a “tax stamp” to the ATF of $200, undergoes a Federal background check, and waits for paperwork to be processed (which generally takes 9 to 12 months to complete per item) and notifies the chief local law enforcement officer. When someone goes to this effort that item is registered to them in a database maintained by the federal government.

There are several proposed bills currently which would remove silencers/suppressors from the NFA controlled items list effectively deregulating them so as to make them obtainable under the same standard background check (NICS) as traditional firearms or with no background check at all depending on the proposal.

Some states have laws against NFA controlled items even when the gun owner has gone through the ATF fee, background check, etc.

What Are Assault Weapons – Semi-Auto / Full-Auto

The definition of “Assault” rifle or weapon varies from one state to another where different local governments have passed regulations of bans on firearms that meet a series of definitions. In 1994 a Federal Law was passed which defined and prohibited the manufacture of assault weapons but that law expired and was not renewed in 2004.

Attempts to define Assault Rifle have been difficult and challenging for those attempting to regulate guns because there is little substantial difference between a popular AR-15 carbine rifle and a semi-automatic shotgun when the core functions are broken down and considered. Thus these regulations often require that in order to be considered an “Assault” rifle/weapon the gun must fit 2 or more criteria as established by the law being proposed or passed.

Traditionally, an assault rifle as defined in military practice, and before various states attempted to pass relevant regulations, was a rifle that had selective or fully automatic firing capabilities. To be clear, semi-automatic refers to the function of a firearm to be able to fire one round (bullet) for each time the trigger is pressed. Selective fire refers to the ability of the firearm to fire more than one round each time the trigger is pressed … and full-automatic (a type of selective fire) allows that with one trigger press rounds will continue to fire until either the firearm runs out of ammunition or the trigger is no longer depressed.

As covered above, any firearm with selective fire capabilities of any form is controlled by the NFA and otherwise illegal to posses.

More information on “Assault Weapons”

Open Carry & Concealed Carry Regulation

The United States 2008 “Heller” decision clarified that the 2nd amendment protects the right of the individual to own a firearm for personal protection. The 2012 Federal District ruling against the State of Illinois clarified that the state must allow in some form, the ability of a citizen that is not disqualified from owning a gun to be able to have it on their person for personal protection when in public.

Today all 50 states have laws that, in theory, allow that private citizens can carry a firearm concealed on or about their person while in public for the purpose of self-defense. 49 States issue a form of a permit or license that when issued allows the gun owner to carry a firearm concealed. Vermont is the exception and doesn't have any sort of permit system.

Without exception, all concealed carry permits require a criminal background check and in most states some form of proof of firearm competency such as prior military service or the completion of a local firearm training course. Required training varies significantly from Virgina where watching online videos is sufficient, to Illinois where the applicant must complete 16 total hours of in-person instruction.

25 States (including Vermont obviously) allow legal gun owners to carry a gun concealed without obtaining any permit at all. These laws are generally referred to as Constitutional Carry or Permitless Carry laws.

In 2022, the US Supreme Court decided NY State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc V Bruen, which addresses a practice referred to as “May Issue” in some states to require the applicant of the permit prove they have just need or good cause to obtain the permit. In many of those states it was virtually impossible to obtain a permit as the issuing department or entity accepts almost no reason to be good enough to obtain a permit. The Supreme Court found this practice unconstitutional and at these states have been forced to remove the discretionary authority to deny permits to someone for a lack of good cause.

More than half of states allow that a citizen that can legally own guns, may carry it openly (opposite of concealed) in certain public places without any license or permit. 15 more states allow that those with “Concealed Carry Permits” can carry both concealed and open. Thus there are only 5 states that do not allow open carry of firearms in any form.

Despite the mostly broad existence of concealed carry across most of the US, the laws that govern where the gun owner may take their gun, how and when they can carry it, if and where they must declare it to law enforcement, and when they may use it in defense of life or property vary significantly by state or in some cases vary by county or city.

More information about May Issue, Shall Issue, and Constitutional Carry States

Concealed Carry Reciprocity

States decide actively if they will or will not honor, recognize, or have formal reciprocity with other states' concealed carry permits. Thus if one has a concealed carry permit from one's home state it may or may not be honored in any neighboring state. States have various criteria to determine which other state permits they will honor. Many states openly honor all permits from all states and a small handful of states choose to not honor permits from any state at all.

National reciprocity legislation and proposals aim to force all states to honor all permits from all other states. This would, to a small degree, remove the burden of the permitted gun owner from having to wonder what states do and don't honor their permit BUT would not remove the significant variance from one state's laws to another. Put differently, even if New York is forced to recognize Pennsylvania permits; New York may still choose where and how one with a permit may carry their firearm and when and how they can use it in their own defense.

More information about reciprocity

Campus Carry – Guns In School Zones

In 1990 the Gun Free School Zone Act was passed which prohibits firearms nationwide within school zones unless the gun owner is otherwise “permitted” by state law. Thus each state can determine if they will remove the federal prohibition of firearms on their school campuses and if so under what circumstances.

Most states thus prohibit firearms on most school campuses. 4 States actively allow that any permitted individual may carry a firearm per state law on any public college campus. 6 additional states also allow permitted individuals to carry on public college campuses BUT allow that each individual school may pass reasonable regulations about how and where on the campus guns may be carried.

20 other states allow schools to determine if firearms will be allowed or not. The remaining 20 states either don't allow firearms on campus at all or only allow them in locked vehicles in the parking lots.

To date, with over a decade of legal campus carry in some states, there have been zero reported incidents of concealed carry permit holders committing a crime with a firearm on a college campus which allowed campus carry.

Stand Your Ground & Self-Defense Law

Florida has made headlines over the last several years due to their supposed controversial “Stand Your Ground” law but almost all references to this law both by the media and law enforcement are wholly incorrect. While self-defense laws, which determine the situations in which a citizen can use force like a gun to defend themselves from others, vary by state there is a mostly universal theme throughout all 50 states.

Effectively 5 things must be true or in place in order for one to legally argue they used force in self-defense legally.

  1. Innocence: The defendant must not have been the aggressor in the fight
  2. Imminence: The threat to the defendant must be imminent/immediate
  3. Avoidance: The defendant must NOT have a safe means of retreat from the threat
  4. Reasonableness: The defendant must have acted reasonably based on the objective view of the judge or jury
  5. Proportionality: The defendant can only use deadly force against a threat of deadly force or serious bodily injury

So what does a “Stand Your Ground” law do? It removes the requirement of avoidance or the duty to retreat from the threat when safely able. Currently, 75% of states have Stand Your Ground laws either explicitly in statute or based on case law, that allow that a citizen may defend themselves EVEN WHEN they have a safe means of retreat.

The law does not allow that the person use deadly force against non-deadly threats, against non-imminent threats, in a way their peers would deem unreasonable, or when they themselves are an aggressor in the confrontation. To suggest anything else is just factually wrong.

Conclusion and A Request

Well there you have it. If you made it this far you now know more about American Gun Laws than most news publications and journalists. Now share this knowledge and report the facts without bias!

If you have a question or think we missed something please let me know in the comments below.

About Jacob Paulsen

Jacob S. Paulsen is the President of provides in-person and online firearm training for American gun owners. The Company is currently teaching in-person classes in 25+ states with a team of more than 55 instructors. Jacob is a NRA certified instructor & Range Safety Officer, USCCA certified instructor and training counselor, Utah BCI instructor, Affiliate instructor for Next Level Training, Graduate and certified instructor for The Law of Self Defense, and a Glock and Sig Sauer Certified Armorer. He resides in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado with his wife and children.


  1. Jim on October 12, 2017 at 8:50 am

    Excellent info, concise and to the point. Thanks .

  2. Bill Nicklaus on October 12, 2017 at 9:21 am

    Thank you for a well written clear understanding of basic gun laws. Would have been helpful to have the States identified.

    • Terry Story on December 15, 2023 at 11:34 pm

      The problem with that Bill is there there is currently more than 23,000 firearms laws in force in the United States, and it ranges far and wide and is way way beyond the scope of this article. There is some very good content here in general terms though, and if you want more than what is here, I would suggest a “Law of Self Defense” class by Andrew Branca, a lawyer that is a specialist in self defense and use of force law. He has a web site and a blog that is quite informative and thorough, and it covers a host of situations that are relevant to use of deadly force. USCCA also has a web site and they also have an extensive database of the laws in all 50 states with respect to firearms and their possession and use. Good luck and I hope that you will be able to spend the time to get a good grasp of all of the aspects of firearms ownership.

  3. Gary Spencer on October 12, 2017 at 9:49 am

    As a practicing attorney and a concealed carry instructor in Illinois, I found this article to be both accurate and well written

  4. Doug on October 12, 2017 at 10:56 am

    Great article, I hope it gets shared enough to reach the targeted audience. I would have hoped you’d include the biggest law of all, the 2nd amendment of the Constitution. It’s effects on states that attempt to “reasonably” regulate guns or not is the foundation for all our arguments.

  5. bob gray on October 12, 2017 at 11:04 am

    Now the question is can the anti gun crowd understand the article or maybe a better question is can they read.

  6. Allen Thompson on October 12, 2017 at 12:51 pm

    This was a very well written and easily understandable article. Looking forward to reading and learning more thank you very much

  7. Matt on October 12, 2017 at 6:59 pm

    Nicely done Jacob. Yes, I do know this however you laid it out so I don’t have to try to articulate this information. Thank you.

  8. Allen Benge on October 12, 2017 at 8:05 pm

    This is a very concise and accurate piece on gun laws as they exist.

  9. W Cohen on October 12, 2017 at 9:21 pm

    this should be required reading for any “reporter” who writes about firearms or gun control

  10. Ben Valentino on October 13, 2017 at 2:06 am

    Right to the point, excellent! Thank you


  11. Mark Farner on October 13, 2017 at 11:39 am

    Since the deregulation of the FCC in 1995 under the Clintonestas, mainstream (lamestream) lost it’s patriotism… because prior the the deregulation we were limited to the ownership of 7 AM, 7 FM and 7 TV stations… it used to be owned by American families who had moral conscience over what our children saw and heard… prior to ’95 they were promoters of patriotism.
    So then where will there be any posts of what Jacob has thoroughly and professionally put together and more importantly, will what the targeted audience learns from Jacob’s research be editorialized away anyway?
    Is this all wishful thinking?
    So let’s take it back to “who owns the show?” and go from there people…

  12. Lee on October 15, 2017 at 7:44 am

    Overall, great article! Certainly, the media needs to get their facts straight. However, we need to ensure the right info is flowing as well. I may be mis-reading the section on NFA items, but I think there are a couple of details which need to be tweaked.

    – There you state, “undergoes a Federal background check (which generally takes 9 to 12 months to complete per item)”. The NICS check is the same as that for any firearm. The 9-12 months is for the NFA paperwork, specifically the Tax Stamp, to come back. As far as I know (and I own several NFA items) there is no additional background check completed during that process. Perhaps I just did not realize that was happening in the background all these years???

    – Similar to the point above, you state about the possible removal of suppressors from the NFA “…effectively deregulating them so as to make them obtainable under the same standard background check (NICS) as traditional firearms.” The Tax Stamp process is what the Hearing Protection Act would eliminate, not an additional background check, unless you are referring to the previously required Law Enforcement approval requirement for individuals (see note below).

    – You also state, “obtains the permission of the chief local law enforcement officer”. That was only true if the NFA item was being purchased by an ‘individual’. That was not required if the item was being purchased by a legal Trust. However, this entire point is now moot due to the NFA amendment enacted last summer. The NFA was again amended on July 15, 2016 to require Law Enforcement “notification”, whether purchased by an individual or legal trust. There is also a requirement for fingerprint cards and background checks on any Trustees assigned to the legal document (if that option is used).

    But again, great piece overall. Covers the critical firearm related topics the national media gets needs to know about, but gets wrong time and time again. We all wish they would take a more diligent approach to their jobs and research their stories more carefully before speaking, but the 24 hour news cycle seems to push a speak now, research background later…maybe.

    • Jacob Paulsen on December 15, 2017 at 10:01 am

      Lee, thank you so much for your comment. Great input. I’ll respond quickly here…

      -On your first point I believe you are correct. I’ve adjusted the language above to hopefully clarify that the 9-12 month waiting period is just that… and isn’t necessarily an additional background check.
      -On your second point I clarified that as well. Different proposals have had different objectives. Some have aimed to remove suppressors from the NFA but maintain them as a regulated item that requires a standard NICS check. Other proposals have aimed to deregulate them completely. So I clarified that.
      -To your point I’m not going to tweak the point about the Chief LEO since that change from the ATF rule ensures that will happen now.

      Thanks again!

  13. Fred Jaramillo on October 21, 2017 at 6:50 am

    Any way we can get a printer friendly version of this article?

    • Jacob Paulsen on October 21, 2017 at 8:38 am

      Yes, I’ll work on that.

  14. Bob on December 14, 2023 at 1:30 pm

    While I do agree that the article is informative, I couldn’t help thinking how the 2nd Amendment is being regulated to a point of uselessness. The gun grabbers would never try to require all these regulations/laws at once, but they chisel a little here, shave a little there, and over time the 2nd Amendment isn’t worth the paper its printed on. We view small increments as not a threat, but over time they all add up.

Leave a Comment