S13E16: The Third Option – Why Shooting to Kill or Wound is Wrong
Podcast: Embed
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS | More
If you prefer to watch the video you can find it at the bottom of this webpage.
Episode Sponsors:
About This Episode:
In this episode, we delve into the misunderstood concepts of “shoot to kill” versus “shoot to wound” in self-defense situations. I, along with my co-host Jacob Paulsen, analyze the tactical and legal ramifications of these phrases, emphasizing that aiming to injure can lead to serious consequences and does not lessen the lethality of the action.
We argue that defensive shooting should prioritize stopping the threat rather than taking a life, advocating for a mindset centered around protecting oneself and others. By sharing real-world examples and drawing from recent training insights, we aim to clarify the importance of responsible intentionality in self-defense encounters, encouraging listeners to focus on neutralizing threats within ethical guidelines.
As always, any questions or suggestions for future episodes can be submitted to podcast@concealedcarry.com!
Thanks for Listening!
Thanks so much for joining us this week. Have some feedback you’d like to share? Leave a note in the comment section below. If you enjoyed the podcast the biggest compliment you could give us would be to subscribe to future episodes via a podcast app on your phone or via iTunes. You can find past podcast episodes by clicking here.
Video Recording:
Press PLAY on the video below to watch the video recording!
