3 MORE Lessons From Concealed Carry Renewal Classes

This article is a continuation of a previous piece based on patterns I consistently see while teaching concealed carry renewal classes. If you haven’t read it yet, start here: 3 Lessons From Concealed Carry Renewal Classes.

In that first article, I focused on training habits, medical preparedness, and dry fire—areas where many armed citizens unintentionally stagnate once they’ve been carrying for a while.

Since then, I’ve continued teaching renewals, and three additional trends keep showing up. Just like the first set, these observations aren’t about shaming people or gatekeeping concealed carry. They’re about identifying gaps that quietly develop over time—and pointing toward ways to close them.

Here are three more lessons from concealed carry renewal classes.

Lesson 1: Less Than Good Guns

When students show up to renewal classes, the guns they bring often fall into a few predictable categories:

LCP

  • Old guns
    Firearms that were once perfectly viable carry options, but have been outpaced by modern improvements in ergonomics, shootability, capacity, and reliability.
  • Cheap guns
    Guns that were clearly chosen because they were the least expensive option available. The biggest issue with these options is reliability and inconsistency. There are smaller and less concerning issues like poor triggers, poor sights, and poor ergonomics. They also tend to signal limited shooting experience—because the more someone shoots, the more they usually understand why their gun is holding them back and they get a sense for what guns are most in use by other gun owners who go to classes and the range.
  • Too-small guns
    Firearms chosen almost exclusively for ease of concealment. They may be easy to carry day to day, but they’re difficult to shoot well. Recoil management suffers, hits become inconsistent, and running the gun effectively becomes a struggle.

None of these choices automatically make someone irresponsible. But taken together, they suggest something important.

They point to a disconnect between the gun owner and current best practices in defensive handgun use.

Gun selection isn’t just about what hides best—it’s about shootability, consistency, and realistically managing the firearm under stress. If this topic resonates, these two articles are worth revisiting:

The gun itself isn’t always the “problem.” What it often reveals is a lack of ongoing engagement with modern training and education.

Lesson 2: Inflated Belief in Shooting Skills (Without Knowing Actual Ability)

Renewal students usually arrive with an expectation of themselves. They believe they should perform reasonably well.

Then we fire the first shots of the class which are shot from 5 yards with the following instruction: Take all the time you need and give me your 5 best shots.

When I ask, “How many of you are happy with your results?”
Not a single hand goes up.

Everyone is disappointed.

The target reflects their current ability, but in their minds, they’ve underperformed. That’s where things get interesting.

When I ask basic capability questions, most students can’t answer them:

  • Could you hit a 3-inch circle at 15 meters?
  • How quickly can you draw and get an effective hit at 7 yards?
  • Under what circumstances would you feel confident drawing on an armed attacker?

I’m not asking for a precise draw time down to the hundredth of a second. I’m asking something more basic: to what degree does an armed attacker need to look away or be distracted for you to have enough time to respond before they notice you and return fire?

When I put those questions into real-world context—how distracted an attacker would need to be, or how much time and space you realistically have—most students have no reference point at all.

This creates a paradox.

On the surface, many students slightly overestimate their ability. But the deeper issue isn’t arrogance—it’s lack of calibration. They don’t truly know what their skill level is, because they’ve never measured it against standards or tested assumptions.

If you carry a gun daily, it’s not unreasonable to expect a basic understanding of your capabilities. In fact, it’s part of the responsibility.

These articles dive deeper into that concept:

Confidence without awareness is fragile—and dangerous.

Lesson 3: Intrigued by, But Lacking Pistol Optics

Out of roughly 80 guns that show up to a renewal class, I typically see one pistol-mounted optic.

Maybe another 10 guns are new enough to be optics-ready—but they’re still running iron sights.

That actually makes sense.

While pistol optics have existed for a while, their reliability, durability, and mainstream acceptance have accelerated mostly in the last 3–5 years. Many renewal students simply haven’t been exposed to them.

That’s why I make it a point during class to have every student pick up one of my dot-equipped pistols and build a sight picture. We talk briefly about focal planes, presentation, and what changes—and in about five minutes, the value of the pistol optic becomes clear.

Most students leave:

  • Intrigued
  • Better informed
  • With a basic understanding of what adopting an optic would actually require

This isn’t about convincing everyone to run a dot. It’s about exposure.

The absence of pistol optics in renewal classes isn’t resistance—it’s lack of opportunity to learn. And for many shooters, optics become the tool that finally forces honest self-assessment.

If you want to explore this further:

Optics don’t make you better automatically—but they do make most shooting tasks easier.

A Challenge Before Your Next Renewal

Taken together, these lessons all point to the same question:

Are you staying current—or just staying comfortable?

Before your next renewal class, ask yourself:

  • Is my gun chosen for shootability, or just convenience? Am I aware of the newer offerings and what might make them optimal?
  • Do I actually know what I can hit, at what distance, and under what conditions?
  • Have I avoided pistol optics simply because I’ve never taken the time to understand them?

Renewal classes don’t expose bad people or careless gun owners. They expose stagnation.

Carrying a firearm is a long-term responsibility. Staying engaged—with your equipment, your skills, and evolving best practices—is part of honoring that responsibility.

The good news? Every one of these gaps is fixable—before the next time you step onto the line.

About Jacob Paulsen

Jacob S. Paulsen is the President of ConcealedCarry.com. For over 20 years Jacob has been involved as a professional in the firearm industry. He values his time as a student as much as his experience as an instructor with a goal to obtain over 40 hours a year of formal instruction. Jacob is a NRA certified instructor & Range Safety Officer, Guardian Pistol instructor and training counselor, Stop The Bleed instructor, Affiliate instructor for Next Level Training, Graduate and certified instructor for The Law of Self Defense, TCCC Certified, and has been a Glock and Sig Sauer Certified Armorer. Jacob is also the creator of The Annual Guardian Conference which is a 3-day defensive handgun training conference.

3 Comments

  1. John Turrentine on January 1, 2026 at 10:21 am

    I was a firearms instructor, both NRA and USCCA certified.

    I was amazed that a majority of my renewal students hadn’t fired or some hadn’t even touched their carry guns since their last renewal class or since they first obtained their carry license. It showed in the classroom and on the range. Their firearms were too small, too big, and too hard for them to manipulate properly. A lot of my students were brand new to firearms and had never taken any formal training.

    I did my best to impart unto them the need for regular and routine practice. I would tell them that having a CCL was not a badge of honor or courage, but a responsibility that needed to be taken seriously.

    I failed two students during my teaching years, but I would have failed many more if I could have. My states requirements are pretty simple. Show up for the 3 hour course and shoot 30 rounds. Passing is 21 out of 30 hits in the silhouette.

    I would impart on my students to practice regularly. Dry fire, drawing from concealment, loading, unloading, sight picture, trigger pull, grip, stance and awareness of their surroundings.

  2. Andrew H. on January 9, 2026 at 10:34 am

    Retired LEO. I’ve carried an original LCP (Custom) for many years. I’ve carried Glock 26 and 27’s but always return to the original LCP. Why? It’s easy to carry. I carry on my hip with a Kydex holster. (Which I consider an additional safety) and you forget it is there. The trigger has always been not good with no slide open on the last round and a wonky trigger reset. Those things are endemic with this gun and I have sent it back to Ruger twice once for a cracked frame and for a new extractor piece and spring and loose front sight. . Both times no cost to me. It is reliable again. I have a hogue grip on this gun which is attached to the gun with an extended pin and heel. Recoil has been significantly reduced. I also use 7 round extended mags for 7+1. I practice with this gun about 4-6 times a year. I’m very good at 3-5 yards okay at 7. Marginal at 15. I know the trade offs with carrying this gun. But it is always with me everywhere and not burdensome to carry at all. Thanks for your article.

  3. Ernie S on January 18, 2026 at 2:34 pm

    I shoot every day. I shoot one of seven different guns. I generally shoot between 2 and 12 rounds. I walk two dogs a mile two or three times a day. On these walks is where I shoot. I generally have good groups but still find myself flinching on rare occasions and shooting low. Practice is not an option it is a necessity. By the way I live where guns are normal and no one questions gun shots even when I practice at night with nite sights.

Leave a Comment