S12E14: Red Dots on Carry Guns…Are They Worth It?

If you prefer to watch the video you can find it at the bottom of this webpage.

Episode Sponsors:

  • Free PIQ Target Sample – Get it HERE! – https://www.concealedcarry.com/piqsample
  • Carry Optics Mastery Course – The comprehensive online video master-course to guide you through pistol optics – https://www.concealedcarry.com/com

About This Episode:

Today, Riley Bowman and Jacob Paulsen discuss the pistol optics and why we think it's important to start considering them, if you're not already. There is quite a bit of data that supports the efficacy of using them in a defensive context. How about you…do you think red dots on pistols are a good idea? Do you or will you use them on your carry gun? Tune in to learn more!

Resources Used in This Episode:

-Sage Dynamics White Paper on MRDS – https://www.sagedynamics.org

-NLEFIA Pistol RDS Survey Final Summary Jan 2025 – https://www.scribd.com/document/811177971/NLEFIA-Pistol-RDS-Survey-Final-Summary-Jan-2025

-Norwich University RDS Pistol Study – https://soldiersystems.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2011_Norwich_Study_RMRvIronSights.pdf

As always, any questions or suggestions for future episodes can be submitted to podcast@concealedcarry.com!

Thanks for Listening!

Thanks so much for joining us this week. Have some feedback you’d like to share? Leave a note in the comment section below. If you enjoyed the podcast the biggest compliment you could give us would be to subscribe to future episodes via a podcast app on your phone or via iTunes. You can find past podcast episodes by clicking here.

Video Recording:

Press PLAY on the video below to watch the video recording!

About Riley Bowman

Riley Bowman is the Director of Training at ConcealedCarry.com and the Host of the Concealed Carry Podcast. He started teaching during his 8-year experience with a state-level law enforcement agency in Colorado. Riley has trained extensively under instructors such as: Rob Leatham, Mike Seeklander, Tom Givens, Tim Herron, Scott Jedlinski, Matt Little, Kyle Lamb, Dave Spaulding, Jeff Gonzales, Bill Blowers, Chuck Pressburg, and others, amassing many hundreds of hours of formal shooting and tactics training. He is an NRA Pistol Instructor, a Colorado P.O.S.T. Handgun and Patrol Rifle Instructor, a Rangemaster Certified Pistol Instructor, a graduate of Trident Concepts Concealed Carry Instructor course, and a Modern Samurai Project Endorsed Instructor. He also competes in USPSA as a Grand Master (Limited Optics), Steel Challenge (Master), and 3-gun competitions, is a multiple-division USPSA Colorado State Champion, and also has multiple top-25 finishes at USPSA and IPSC National Championships in multiple divisions.

4 Comments

  1. Quinn on November 16, 2025 at 8:18 am

    I don’t need them nor require them . The distance in a self defense scenario doesn’t support needing them
    Furthermore, if you need a red dot to aim at that distance then you need more training

    • Jacob Paulsen on November 16, 2025 at 2:06 pm

      I don’t need or require them either. I do however, acknowledge that they give me an advantage over using iron sights alone regardless of the distance.

  2. Donnie on November 26, 2025 at 5:15 pm

    I’d stick with iron sights. Especially if you have to respond to a threat within 20 feet. A red dot could cost you too much time trying to aim. Unless there is a continued threat from someone fleeing, using the red dot would be too much of a temptation to try to stop someone no longer a danger. Once the bad guy stops firing — law enforcement should take over. Legal risk of proving it was self-defense may not be upheld in court. Adrenaline could contribute to making a decision that could put you in legal jeopardy. Keep red dots for target proficiency. Not for quick self-defense

    • Jacob Paulsen on November 26, 2025 at 8:07 pm

      Aiming with a dot doesn’t take any more time than aiming with iron sights. I would argue its even faster.

Leave a Comment