Armed Marine Veteran Helps Stop Memorial Drive Shooter

A man walked down the middle of Memorial Drive in Cambridge, Massachusetts, with a rifle, firing into traffic. That's the worst-case scenario every concealed carrier has thought about. It happened on May 11.

By the time it was over, fifty to sixty rounds had been fired and at least a dozen vehicles were hit. Two men in separate cars were struck and rushed to Boston hospitals with life-threatening injuries. And the active threat was ended within minutes — by a Massachusetts State Police trooper and a Marine veteran with a license to carry.

Image capture from Google

Another good guy with a gun helped save the day.

What happened on Memorial Drive

Around 1:30 PM on Monday, May 11, a man began firing a modern sporting rifle (media reports called it an “assault-style rifle”) erratically at vehicles on Memorial Drive near the intersection with River Street. Witnesses described him walking down the center of the road, shooting at random cars and waving the rifle at others.

Trooper Landon Veney was one of the first law enforcement officers on scene. According to the police report filed in court, the suspect fired his rifle at Trooper Veney before the trooper returned fire. Veney's cruiser was struck during the exchange — a round hit the front driver's-side A-pillar.

That's the part I want you to sit with for a second. The trooper wasn't engaging from a position of advantage. He was being shot at.

What changed the equation was a civilian — a Marine veteran legally carrying under a Massachusetts License to Carry — who moved toward the shooter instead of away from him. The Marine engaged the gunman and, according to Middlesex County District Attorney Marian Ryan, helped get people out of the area by drawing the shooter's attention.

Within minutes, the suspect was on the ground with multiple gunshot wounds to his extremities. The trooper and the Marine were not injured.

Why two armed defenders changed everything

When one armed defender engages a threat alone, the threat can focus all of his attention, and all of his rounds, on a single target. That's why Trooper Veney's cruiser took a hit. The shooter knew where the return fire was coming from, and he was actively engaging it.

Add a second armed defender from a different position, and the math breaks down for the bad guy. He can either keep engaging the trooper and get hit by the Marine, or pivot to the Marine and get hit by the trooper. There is no third option. I don't have secret video surveillance. I don't have all the details. I'm making some assumptions based on the limited information we do have.

Two armed responders, working independently from likely very separate angles, created a tactical problem the gunman could not solve. He went down. Neither defender was hit.

For context, the gunman had already fired fifty to sixty rounds before he was stopped. Another few minutes of unopposed shooting on a busy public road on a sunny afternoon could have looked very different. The intervention didn't just stop a single shooter. It almost certainly prevented a mass casualty event.

This was Massachusetts. That matters.

Massachusetts is not friendly territory for armed carriers. The LTC process is one of the most demanding in the country, with discretionary elements, training requirements, and a meaningful approval timeline. People who get and keep a Massachusetts LTC are, almost by definition, motivated and screened.

The Marine veteran was one of them. And DA Ryan didn't credit luck. She credited training, saying he “quickly, based apparently on his training, realized what was going on and the danger that was being created.”

Massachusetts State Police Col. Geoffrey Noble went further, calling what the trooper and the Marine did “arguably the most heroic thing I've ever seen” in more than 30 years in law enforcement.

The harder part of this story

The man who walked down Memorial Drive that afternoon had been released from inpatient psychiatric care three days earlier. Less than an hour before he opened fire, he made suicidal threats on a video call with his parole officer and displayed the rifle. Police were already attempting a well-being check at his home when the shooting began.

He's not getting named in this article. But it's worth saying plainly: this was a man in crisis who needed help he didn't get in time. He was also a prohibited person who never should have had the rifle in the first place. The systems meant to flag him, treat him, and keep firearms out of his hands all failed before any of this reached Memorial Drive.

Two things can be true at once. The people he shot did not deserve what happened to them, and the man who shot them was failed by the people who were supposed to be watching him. None of that excuses what he did. It does suggest there's no clean policy answer that would have stopped this.

What did stop it was two armed men who chose to move toward the gunfire.

What carriers should take from this

A few things worth thinking about before the next time you put on your holster:

  • Training is the variable, not the gun. The DA didn't credit the Marine's caliber, holster, or carry method. She credited his training. Spend the money on instruction.
  • Position and angle matter as much as marksmanship. A second defender from a different position multiplies the effect far beyond doubling it. If you ever find yourself alongside another lawful armed defender, where you stand matters.
  • Movement beats freezing. The Marine didn't engage from his car. He closed distance and changed position. That's not the instinct most untrained people have under fire.
  • You won't have all the information. The Marine didn't know who the shooter was, why he was shooting, or what the trooper was about to do. He saw rounds going into civilian vehicles and made a decision. Sometimes that's the whole job.

The two men whose names we know — Trooper Landon Veney and the still-unidentified Marine veteran — gave the rest of us a real-world case study in what trained, motivated response under fire actually looks like. The least we can do is study it.

About Jacob Paulsen

Jacob S. Paulsen is the President of ConcealedCarry.com. For over 20 years Jacob has been involved as a professional in the firearm industry. He values his time as a student as much as his experience as an instructor with a goal to obtain over 40 hours a year of formal instruction. Jacob is a NRA certified instructor & Range Safety Officer, Guardian Pistol instructor and training counselor, Stop The Bleed instructor, Affiliate instructor for Next Level Training, Graduate and certified instructor for The Law of Self Defense, TCCC Certified, and has been a Glock and Sig Sauer Certified Armorer. Jacob is also the creator of The Annual Guardian Conference which is a 3-day defensive handgun training conference.

9 Comments

  1. Glenn Gross on May 27, 2026 at 1:36 pm

    THAT IS NOT THE 1ST TIME THAT MARINE WAS UNDER FIRE HE KNEW WHAT TO DO ADVANCE AND TAKE CARE OF THE PROBLEM

  2. Lou Esposito on May 27, 2026 at 2:24 pm

    Thank God for good people! Arm good people and train them and we will all be safer. (I have 39 years in law enforcement, now retired and teach firearms to civilians)

  3. John D on May 27, 2026 at 3:37 pm

    Thanks for the recap and analysis, Jacob.

  4. Evelyn on May 27, 2026 at 8:17 pm

    Banning guns won’t stop bad people from having guns. If good people are not armed, evil will be armed and use guns against the good and the innocent.

  5. John Lyons on May 27, 2026 at 8:24 pm

    Thank you for critically analyzing the pertinent details and unique aspects of this horrible situation. The bravery and quick, decisive action of Trooper Veney and the (Semper Fi!) Marine veteran ended this atrocity without loss of innocent life. The MA restrictions on lawful carry are very important too, as certain states continue to impede and infringe upon 2A rights and firearms access to a point that makes armed civilian intervention less likely, increasing the odds of more adverse outcomes. But — and call me a nitpicker if you must — I cannot abide the term “assault-style rifle” in describing the perpetrator’s weapon. This is exactly the kind of nonsensical term that gun-banners and liberal legislators have used to scare the populace into voting for unconstitutional bans. If the criminal had a semi-automatic rifle, say so. If he had a machine gun, say so. If he had a true selective-fire, shorter-barrel firearm that could be accurately described as an assault rifle — the kind issued to military forces — say so! A well-known radio commentator often said, “Words mean things,” so for the sake of accuracy — and especially in a forum designed for people who know the difference — please delete that offensive term from your literary guide.

  6. Michael Matteson on May 27, 2026 at 8:55 pm

    Why is the Marine not mentioned in the news..?? One early report mentioned his part in this incident but since then there has been no mention of him by the news media. Why is this being kept secret???

    • anonymous on May 28, 2026 at 8:39 am

      He may prefer to stay anonymous to avoid anti-gun hecklers.

  7. John on May 28, 2026 at 9:52 pm

    That’s shows you don’t need one in chamber when you carry. This Marine got out of his car and went to the trunk to take out his locked, secured safe gun

Leave a Comment